Jack Loge vs Andrej Nedic Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 16 May at 11:57 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
J. Loge vs A. Nedic

BEL
1
Win
Played
0
Win

BIH
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Loge 1 - 0 Nedic
They have played 2 sets in total, with Jack Loge winning 2 and Andrej Nedic winning 0. The last match between Jack Loge and Andrej Nedic was at the M15 Prijedor, 16-05-2025, Round: QF, Surface: Clay, with Jack Loge getting the victory 6-0 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Loge | 1 |
| Nedic | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(QF) M15 Prijedor(05-16-25)
J. Loge vs A. Nedic H2H Profile
J. Loge vs A. Nedic Match Preview:
- Second Serve Performance: In recent form, Loge has won 41.45% of points on their second serve, while Nedic has secured 42.49%. Could this slight edge indicate a potential winner?
- Return Game Stats: Loge has claimed 44.01% of their opponent's second serve points, whereas Nedic has a higher success rate at 46.45%. Is Nedic's superior return game an indicator of dominance?
- First Serve Return: Loge has a success rate of 29.7% in returning first serves, while Nedic stands stronger at 32.34%. Does Nedic's return prowess give them an advantage in this encounter?
- Under Pressure Analysis: Loge has saved 50.51% of breakpoints, compared to Nedic's 49.67%. In critical moments, does Loge have a slight edge in resilience?
- Performance Overview: Loge's match win rate over the past year is 57.63%, whereas Nedic's is 71.83%. Does Nedic's consistent winning pattern make them the favorite?
- Best Surface: Loge excels on hard courts, with a 63% win rate, while Nedic performs best on clay, with a 66% win rate. How will this affect the match outcome if played on a different surface?
- Player Level: Both players typically compete in ITF tournaments, with Nedic having a higher win percentage at 71.83% compared to Loge's 57.63%. Can Nedic's higher success rate at the same level forecast a win?
- Opponent Quality: Loge's average opponent rank over the last year is 438.22, while Nedic's is slightly better at 426.3. Will facing tougher competition benefit Nedic in this match?
- Deciding Set Performance: Loge has won 50% of deciding sets in the past year, but Nedic has a remarkable 75% win rate. Does Nedic's ability to close tight matches suggest they’re a likely victor?
- Break Point Conversion: Loge converts 36.67% of break point opportunities, whereas Nedic converts 42.5%. Does Nedic's edge in this area give them a tactical advantage?
Editorial Prediction (May 16, 2025, UTC):
The comparison of recent second serve performance suggests a slight edge for Nedic, who has demonstrated more consistency than Loge. Coupled with a stronger return game, Nedic might have the upper hand in longer rallies, especially given the importance of return stats.
An analysis of performance under pressure shows Loge with a minor advantage in break point saves, yet Nedic outshines with a stronger conversion rate. This indicates a higher likelihood for Nedic to capitalize on critical opportunities.
Moreover, Nedic's higher first serve return success and ability to win deciding sets by a significant margin could play a pivotal role if the match becomes intensely competitive.
Taking into consideration their overall win percentages and consistency across similar tournament settings, coupled with his ability to perform effectively in high-stakes situations, Nedic appears to be the more likely winner in this match-up against Loge.
Jack Loge vs Andrej Nedic Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
J. Loge vs A. Nedic H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 3 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:9:57 | Average Match Time | 1:9:57 |
| 75% (41/55) | 1st Serve % | 66% (33/50) |
| 63% (26/41) | 1st Serve Win % | 48% (16/33) |
| 57% (8/14) | 2nd Serve Win % | 35% (6/17) |
| 50% (5/10) | Break Pts Won % | 20% (1/5) |
| 56% (28/50) | Return Points Win % | 38% (21/55) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
J. Loge Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QF | L | 6-1 6-2 | ||
R2 | W | 3-6 7-6(4) 6-1 | ||
R1 | W | 6-2 7-6(7) | ||
R1 | L | 7-6(4) 6-2 | ||
R1 | L | 7-5 7-5 | ||
A. Nedic Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
F | W | 4-6 7-5 7-5 | ||
SF | W | 6-3 6-0 | ||
QF | W | 6-1 3-6 6-3 | ||
R2 | W | 6-4 3-6 6-4 | ||
R1 | W | 6-1 6-0 | ||

J. Loge vs A. Nedic Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58.10% (122/88) | YTD Win/Loss | 67.94% (142/67) |
| 55.67% (270/215) | Sets Win/Loss | 64.04% (301/169) |
| 52.05% (2391/2203) | Games Win/Loss | 56.00% (2394/1881) |
| 62.26% (66/40) | Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 55.79% (53/42) | Clay Win/Loss | 68.50% (137/63) |
| 33.33% (3/6) | Indoor Hard W/L | 55.56% (5/4) |
| 0.16 | Aces Per Game | 0.11 |
| 370 | Aces Total | 226 |
| 0.24 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.17 |
| 534 | Total Double Faults | 363 |
| 1:19:59 | Average Match Time | 1:24:6 |
| 365.36 | Average Opponent Rank | 390.3 |
| 63% (7175/11442) | 1st Serve % | 64% (7106/11157) |
| 65% (4633/7175) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (4501/7106) |
| 48% (2060/4267) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (2043/4051) |
| 44% (572/1305) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (721/1435) |
| 42% (4933/11675) | Return Points Win % | 46% (5246/11363) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0.00% (0/4) |
| 57.14% (4/3) | Challenger W/L | 20.00% (2/8) |
| 58.13% (118/85) | Futures W/L | 71.79% (140/55) |
| 57% (117/204) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 68% (139/205) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 59% (26/44) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 45% (14/31) |
| 57% (38/67) | Deciding Set Win % | 65% (35/54) |
| 87% (116/101) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (141/127) |
| 12% (116/14) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (141/14) |
| 21% (94/20) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (68/15) |